So what did I actually buy ?
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 5:27 pm
I am on the search to understand the configuration of my 'bgt. I know it has been 50 years but the brake issue .. and how far out of context it is means there is more of a story here. The car is in storage now waiting to go on a rotisserie in the spring ...
I have asked this question else ware and have had various folks tell me:
. that the original owner swapped all the original parts out and replaced with earlier parts;
. the car was in a bad accident and rebuilt (no sign of damage)... but if it was, would older parts be used.. especially brake circuit ?;
. it was build that way. Except, in 1968 the brake hydraulic system was upgraded to dual circuit.
History
The second owner bought it in 1978 (in Canada) from a military person who imported it from Antigua. The front seats were sun rotted (so were the rear that I have) and there was money in the dash and console from that country. The second owners replaced the front seats (not sure from what year) and carbs ('71) and the trans was swapped out for an o/d ('71) plus a respray to a colour they liked. The dome light and one gauge were also replaced. Other than that, it is original.
The car is registered as a '71 but they thought (and were told by others) that it was a '69 or earlier. I have a clutch and pressure plate that the PO had bought as a spare.. for '69 and earlier. The serial numbers (body and engine) numbers seemed to indicate a '72 by Clausager and confirmed to be built in Jan '72 by the British Heritage Trust. Unfortunately, the destination dealer is unknown. Are there any other ways to find out where the car was initially sold ?
At first glance, these are the visual differences:
. Blinkers and rear lights
. dash/ gauges and console
. no wheel key lock
. the alternator
. brake master cylinder - single circuit which is pre '68.
What has been mentioned. For a NA spec car, it has :
. Single brake circuit system, 62-67
. Dash is pre-68 with a 72-74 console grafted on.
. Steering wheel is 72-73?
. It is a wide-tunnel car, I think that would make the body a 68 or later?
How did this get off the assembly line ?
Thanx
I have asked this question else ware and have had various folks tell me:
. that the original owner swapped all the original parts out and replaced with earlier parts;
. the car was in a bad accident and rebuilt (no sign of damage)... but if it was, would older parts be used.. especially brake circuit ?;
. it was build that way. Except, in 1968 the brake hydraulic system was upgraded to dual circuit.
History
The second owner bought it in 1978 (in Canada) from a military person who imported it from Antigua. The front seats were sun rotted (so were the rear that I have) and there was money in the dash and console from that country. The second owners replaced the front seats (not sure from what year) and carbs ('71) and the trans was swapped out for an o/d ('71) plus a respray to a colour they liked. The dome light and one gauge were also replaced. Other than that, it is original.
The car is registered as a '71 but they thought (and were told by others) that it was a '69 or earlier. I have a clutch and pressure plate that the PO had bought as a spare.. for '69 and earlier. The serial numbers (body and engine) numbers seemed to indicate a '72 by Clausager and confirmed to be built in Jan '72 by the British Heritage Trust. Unfortunately, the destination dealer is unknown. Are there any other ways to find out where the car was initially sold ?
At first glance, these are the visual differences:
. Blinkers and rear lights
. dash/ gauges and console
. no wheel key lock
. the alternator
. brake master cylinder - single circuit which is pre '68.
What has been mentioned. For a NA spec car, it has :
. Single brake circuit system, 62-67
. Dash is pre-68 with a 72-74 console grafted on.
. Steering wheel is 72-73?
. It is a wide-tunnel car, I think that would make the body a 68 or later?
How did this get off the assembly line ?
Thanx